The following data is from ScienceDirect Journal: Energy Storage Materials:

The performance of sulfide ASSLBs reported in the literature:

Cathode/electrolyte/anode *Current density (mA cm–2)Voltage windowInitial capacity (mAh g–1)Capacity after cycle (mAh g–1)Cycle numbersCapacity retention rate
S-C-LPSBr/LPSBr/Li-In0.320-3 V vs. In358.98204.063056.84%
C-S/LPSCl/Li-In0.0640.4-3.0 V vs. Li-In13004002030.77%
FeS2/78Li2S·22P2S5/Li-In0.050.0-4.2 V vs. Li-In11365605049.30%
LCO/LPSCl/Li-In0.0662.6-4.3 V vs. Li-In150902560.00%
LMO/LPSCl/Li-In0.0662.4-4.0 V vs. Li-In73402254.79%
NCM111/LPSCl/Li-In0.0662.8-3.4 V vs. Li-In80602075.00%
NCM622/LPSCl/Li-In0.2142.60-4.30 V128.952.410040.65%
LCO@LNO/Li6.25PS5.25Cl0.75/Li0.13.0-4.2 V vs Li108.680.543074.12%
0.05-66.280059.70%
NCM811@LNO/LPSCl/Li0.05C2.5-4.0 V vs Li111.7100.210089.70%
NCM811/Li5.7PS4.7Cl1.3/In0.2551.88-3.78 V vs. In-83.410059.23%
0.382-50.666.60%
NCM811@LNO/Li5.7PS4.7Cl1.3/In0.764-74.778.30%
LZO@LCO/LPSCl/In0.1C1.9-3.6 V vs. In-84.110072.00%
NCM75/LPSCl/Li-In0.2 C3.0-4.3 V vs. Li-In180-10084.20%
LPSCl@LTO/LPSCl/Li0.05C1.0-2.5 V vs. Li @80°C-158.425094.30%
NCA80/LPSCl/Li0.1C2.5-4.3 V vs Li--10080.90%
LCO/LPSCl/In0.0643.3-4.3 V vs. In @80°C18015425085.56%
NCM75/Li6PS5Cl0.5Br0.5/Li
(with 1 wt% LiTFSI)
0.1C3.0-4.3 V vs. Li163-10091.60%
LCO/LPSCl/In0.1C3.0-4.3 V vs. Li123-10065.50%
LCO/3D-composite/Li0.2C3.0-4.3 V vs. In13311816088.72%

Legend

Cathode

  • LCO:
  • LMO:
  • LNO:
  • LZO:
  • LTO:
  • NCM111:
  • NCM622:
  • NCM811:
  • NCM70:
  • NCM75:
  • NCA80:

Electrolyte

  • LiTFSI: Lithium Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide
  • LPSCI: Lithium Phosphorous Sulfur Chloride
  • 3D-composite: The p-LPSCl/P(PEGMEA) composite
    • p-LPSCl: 3D self-supported porous skeleton with selenium sulfide (SeS2) as the pore former;
    • P(PEGMEA): In-situ polymerization of Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (PEGMEA)